An analysis of global warming climate change

While some areas will experience greater increases than others, Figure 1 presents the average change that is projected to occur across the globe under the Reference and Mitigation scenarios. As shown, temperatures in the Mitigation scenario eventually stabilize, though due to the inertia of the climate system, stabilization is not reached until several decades after the peak in radiative forcing.

An analysis of global warming climate change

Climate ChangeRisk Analysis It is often the case that at the end of one of my talks about some aspect of climate research or about the development of tools for the analysis of climate I get asked questions regarding global warming.

Or more to the point, I am asked whether we should or should not be concerned about warming. I know full well that my answers to this line of questioning is never satisfying; sometimes this is purposely so. I do have something to say about global warming and global change, but it is nothing more than a personal opinion.

That of a concerned citizen, rather than of an expert on this issue. I have taken the time and the effort to examine the data used by others to demonstrate a global warming trend, I understand how this data has been processed and what are the challenges involved in making the analyses.

The upshot is that I have not seen any data or analysis that demonstrates that warming is not occurring. Like the myriad of people who work in global climate trends, I also see a very significant correlation between human activities and warming that make the industrial-era warming trend unlike any other change in climate before then.

The idea that climatologists and the governments that fund them have a self interest in promulgating global warming is so childish and yet so amazingly distracting to even thoughtful people: If anyone has a self interest in what climate does, however, it An analysis of global warming climate change those whose livelihood is affected by the state of climate itself, the groups from where most of the people who use this line of thinking come from.

An analysis of global warming climate change

This is not a laughing matter: I was not keen on how the nuclear industry does its business, but to nearly kill nuclear research was a terrible thing: If you live in the South West of the US, as I do, you are familiar with pre-Columbian communities that disappeared because of sudden drought, or post-Columbian communities that were wiped out not by war but by the rapid introduction of new diseases.

The main reason I cannot give you more than a personal opinion on the implications of global warming is that it is a risk analysis problem and this is not within the range of my expertise, not by a mile: But that I know a little bit of probability theory and a little bit of climate dynamics is not adequate, just as someone who might know something about probability and know how to design cars will be poorly equipped to design liability insurance instruments.

There are parallels with the risk analysis problem associated with cigarette smoking: There is a compelling correlation between cigarette smoking and some forms of cancer; but to date, no one knows exactly how cigarettes cause cancer.

The causation relation between human activities burning hydrocarbons, among other things and global warming is not fully understood either. Decisions need to be made now we cannot wait to know everything on climate. In the cigarette case, actions were taken to curb smoking, because the risk analysis made it clear that it was better to curb smoking than not.

An analysis of global warming climate change

No one waited for the causation mechanism to be fully elucidated. The cigarette risk analysis is not a perfect analogue to the climate change risk analysis problem: On the other hand, climate will and does change, whether it is due to human activities or not.

Climate change can have huge impact on some or many of us. Natural or man-made, some of the people who stand to loose a lot from the change are those very people who rely extraordinarily on cheap amounts of energy to make it through a change that can have monumental effects on society and the economy.

To characterize this problem as non-existent is stupid. But to think that it is just a bit more complicated than what we need to do to keep the Mississippi river flowing in the same place, always, is at best, irresponsible.

It is perfectly valid to ask, as some climate change debaters do, whether putting in the presumed huge resources to tackling climate change right now would be better spent on wiping out hunger or ravaging diseases, for example.

No one really knows what could be done to weather or climate change. Some scenarios include climate engineering. Climate engineering gives some people the shivers, since it requires us to know a lot about climate I think far more than we know at presentbut research in it should be pursued.

Virtually every risk analysis scenario involves two aspects of human activity: Both issues are correlated with warming and go beyond climate change. Did I also mention that some of it is unpalatable, if you are the country that uses about one quarter of all energy worldwide, or if you are a developing nation, or if you are neither but your country is slowly disappearing under the waves and you have zero influence on the rest of humanity?

What are the key challenges in climate dynamics that need to be handled in order to produce serious climate-change risk analysis strategies? You can mention obvious things: Significantly improved means on bounds on uncertainties and better means to obtain these.

In models they need significantly more reliable ways to capture how local effects affect global ones and vice versa. They need faster ways of producing different climate scenarios.CLIMATE CHANGE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS ANALYSIS.

By Charles Rhodes, Xylene Power Ltd. GLOSSARY OF TERMS. DEVELOPMENT OF THIS ANALYSIS: In late I made a plot of annual average temperature, as measured by Environment Canada at the Toronto International Airport, versus time for the forty year period to Climate Change and Global warming: Gathering is a discussion to investigate issues of common worry and also trade learning, share proof and thoughts, and create arrangements.

The gathering is about advancing worldwide Climate problems and propelled advances used to . Apr 26,  · temperatures, global warming is feared for its effects on climate change, such as rising sea levels and the melting of glaciers, that will ultimately result in a non-sustainable environment and negative health consequences for mankind.

Scientific assessment reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) indicate that the warming of the global climate system is unequivocal and is mostly caused by the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations due to human activities such as .

The Global Climate Change Currently, when human life is growing, human activities play an impact on the environment and climate, which leads to global climate change.

Climate change is a problem of the whole world, and therefore remains a huge challenge for life on Earth. Global warming is defined as the long-term trend of increasing average global temperatures; alternatively, climate change is defined as a change in global or regional climate patterns, in particular a change apparent from the mid to late 20 th century onwards and attributed to the increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide arising from the.

Analysis of "in many ways global warming will be a good thing" - Climate Feedback